Could GE (GE) Go To Zero? (GE)

|

jeffimmelt5.jpgGE's stock (GE) continues to dive, recently hitting $16 (mid-1990s levels). In this economy, anything is possible. So could it go to zero?

If GE were still primarily an industrial company, this possibility would be so remote as to be barely worth considering (assuming GE's current cash flows and cash cushion). Now that GE has such a huge finance division, the odds are higher, but still remote.

As Warren Buffett pithily explained, anything multiplied by zero is zero, so if GE Finance suddenly has a run on the bank, the rest of the company could go down with it. That said, GE Finance is insulated from the credit crisis by carrying far less leverage (debt) than its Wall Street competitors and also by not marking its entire book of assets to market. If it had to do the latter, GE Finance's writedowns thus far would likely have been far greater than they have been. By holding loans to maturity instead of in a trading book, however, GE Finance can wait to take losses until loans actually stop performing. This eases the pressure on near-term funding requirements and reduces the likelihood of a run on the bank.

GE Finance 1.pngGE is also rushing to diversify its sources of short-term financing by building a consumer bank, which has gathered $43 billion in deposits thus far (up from $20 billion last year). (See graphic at left). These deposits can be used to reduce GE's dependence on commercial paper, which has previously funded much of GE Finance's short-term cash needs. Lastly, the government is now buying GE's commercial paper, which eliminates the need to worry about private investors suddenly getting scared and cutting off the company's oxygen supply.

For GE Finance to go to zero, the company's short-term financing would have to dry up suddenly, the way Lehman Brothers', Bear Stearns, and AIG's did. Now that the government is buying GE paper, this seems highly unlikely. Also, because the company isn't marking its whole book to market, it's unlikely that it will have to take devastating losses each quarter that would suddenly make its leverage ratio fly through the roof (and blow its credit rating), as happened at its erstwhile Wall Street competitors.

More likely, GE Finance will just continue to have crappy profits until the credit crisis ends. This could still hammer the stock, as GE Finance's profits still account for more than a third of GE's profits. In a really bad scenario, if GE's $600 billion of loans started to default en masse, this might force GE to raise more equity capital or sell off other divisions at fire sale prices just to cover the Finance losses. But even this still wouldn't be likely kill the whole company.

So we've got that going for us.

More from GE's Q3 investor presentation below:

GE Finance 2.png

GE Finance 3.png

GE Finance 4.png

 

65 Comments

fusion said:
Isn't finance a subsidiary, so that if its value went below zero, GE could just abandon it? Stockholders are not generally liable for the obligations of the companies in which they own shares. Or has GE guaranteed Finance or otherwise become responsible for its obligations?
They can't just throw it off the truck. GE Finance has lent $600 billion against about $200 billion of borrowed cash. That's $400 billion it would have to come up with if all the loans defaulted and the creditors suddenly demanded their money back.

GE could sell the division (or, if things got really bad, pay someone to take it), and as long as the other divisions were worth more than it lost on Finance, the rest of the company would still have value.

But they can't just say, "Um, we've decided we don't want this $600 billion of loans anymore."
princetontiger said:
Henry, this is a pretty good analysis...
fusion said:
>>But they can't just say, "Um, we've decided we don't want this $600 billion of loans anymore." >>

Which "they" are you talking about? GE or GE Finance?

GE Finance can't decide to ignore its obligations. The question is whether GE is on the hook for those obligations.

You say GE Finance borrowed 200 and lent 600. Where did Finance get the other 400? If it was equity from GE, then GE may lose the money, but Finance won't have to come up with the money if the loans default. If it was third party debt, Finance will have to repay (but not GE unless it guaranteed the debt).
Right. GE can always cover the losses, but even GE doesn't have enough cash flow to cover the short-term financing requirements indefinitely.

So if GE Finance's financing disappeared, GE would likely have to sell off other divisions (or equity) to raise enough money to plug the hole.

All of this is extremely unlikely given the government's buying GE paper. And if we take GE at its word, the loan loss exposure shouldn't get beyond single-digit percentages of the asset portfolio (fingers crossed).
Henry

Thank you for providing a very realistic portrayal of GE's current condition and future outlook.

Many bloggers seem to enjoy posting ridiculous armegeddon type rumors about GE with no substantial facts or financials to back up their thoughts. Unfortunately, many people read these rumors and this just causes more panic and drives the stock price down.

fusion said:
Why would GE have to plug the hole? Is it legally obligated to do so? A primary idea of corporate form is that shareholders are not responsible for the debts of the company.

I share the others' appreciation of your work.
Jim said:
Isn't it true that even though GE does not guarantee the debt of GE Capital, it does guarantee that GE Capital will maintain certain liquidity and coverage ratios? Isn't this an indirect guarantee of GE Capital's debt and makes it extremely unlikely that GE Capital would default or that GE would abandon GE Capital?
Shareholders aren't personally responsible for corporate debts, but if any debt remains after company's assets are liquidated, stock is worth zero.
FNP said:
What is the corporate structure? Obviously, if GE Finance is unable to repay its obligation the stock in the subsidiary is worth zero. But are the debts recourse back to the parent company? My guess is they are, at least to some extent, because the AAA rating of GE Finance couldn't be justified without the backing of the parent.
Dr Younis said:
Never treat the unlikely as impossible or the likely as certain.
Alex Schleber (URL) said:
So for the presumably worst recession since the G.D., they are assuming credit losses below those of the mildish 1991-92 recession?

And if you read that last slide more closely, it is saying something like: 59% international credit, of that 79% consumer = 47% consumer international total, of that (or the whole thing actually, not clear) 58% consumer secured, which sounds like Home Equity Loans to me, no? And we all know how those have worked out/are working out...

Am I reading too much into this? It seems to me like their exposure is pretty massive, even though, as Henry points out, they may not have to do any large-scale write-downs for a while. But that 2% default number looks dangerously blue-eyed...
Jake said:
Henry, I'm thinking fusion here thinks that GE Finance isn't really GE, that GE merely owns shares in GE Finance.

Look GE Finance IS GE. Its a division of GE. Any money owed by Finance is owed by GE.
a nonie mouse said:
another lame analysis and post with a question mark in the title. something like"

"Did Henry Blodget Engage in A Sexual Intercourse with a Chicken Last Night?"
It was faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabulous.
Neophyte said:
How safe is the dividend?
EconAnalyst said:
How safe is the dividend seems to be a fair question at this point.

I think you could see the dividend get dropped for a short period of time to shore up the balance sheet. GE is in everyones 401(K). Any move that the company would take to prevent going to zero would be welcome to the large institution shareholders that control most of the stock. Most GE employees also have a large chuck on their own assets in the common stock of the firm.

When I worked for GE, Sherin kept beating the drum of AAA credit rating, 10% organic growth and constant dividend. That was when the stock was stuck in the $32 - $35 range.

Jake is correct. GE Money is part of GE, there is no separation that would allow GE to drop GE Money.

I think you could see the stock drop below $10 / share, which would be a ~4.75 PE ratio. Phillips is already below that level.

Final note, I love the GE 'Inspira' font. Cost the company millions of dollars and it looks like garbage if you reduce the font size below 14.




Delma said:

If Henry said unlikely,
Again I said,
"Never treat the unlikely as impossible or the likely as certain."
Jake said:
@Econ Analyst:

I too worked for GE... one of the underperforming units. At that time almost every other division was regarded as a stepchild compared to GE Capital.

I bet the "stepchildren" are secretly snickering now if not for the fact that their retirement funds are mostly tied to GE stock.
Henry,great article...BTW,did you read the James Quinn article on GE...highly recommended..Seeking Alpha
EconAnalyst said:
If anyone is interested in GE based propaganda.

http://www.gereports.com/
kguy said:
whoaaaa henry!!!!!

can we do a price point of where the stocks will be in 1 year.

citi - goner
bac - 5 bucks
aapl - 40
goog - 120
ge - 0
rimm - 15
crm - 10
fslr - 40
spwr 10
hig, pru,met - goners?
american govt - 0
fed - 0
consumers - 0
Walt in Raleigh said:
I have quite a bit of $ in GE Interest Plus which is not gov.insured. How safe is it?
Also depend on my GE Pension. Is it fully funded and would it continue in event GE failed?
Ted Stryker said:
Remember the days not so many years ago when we (employees and ex-employees) grabbed our stock options certificates and said "hey wow... it will never go below $50..."

Wes said:
Ge is a good buy at 13 - $ cost average back-in
Required? said:
I will continue to buy GE stock as it dips, because I know somehow it will shoot off like a rocket here about 5-9 months when everyone stops getting scared.

Is GE Finance the division that holds the mortgage backed securities? These securities, as everyone is aware, has all the subprime loan tied into it. How much is it estimated that GE holds? Is the government buying this from GE?
Jim said:
Maybe Toyota should buy GE... "Saved by Zero!"
Fletcher Phelan said:
Henry did a fabulous job, especially for shareholders who seldom find such detailed info anywhere else. Many thanks.
Are we going to do as the Roman's did? said:
GE's impact on the world is much greater than most people think. If this company goes under we're in for some serious problems. Before, my former company was bought by GE I thought it was just light bulbs, appliances, and cheap products at WalMart :) . But, holly cow! It's amazing everything that GE is into...or not into.

So...as the stock dips and my GE 401K drops, I'm going to stock up on GE Stock. It's going back up at some point. The oldest company on the Stock Exchange will bounce back.
curtis said:
I don't work for G.E.,but working overseas i have seen some funny things going on. Not from g,e, but from our present gov.We lost Nigeria for infrastruture on lights and water because of our gov. G.E will survive because they are in so many fields that is needed all over the world if our gov. will turn them a loose to be a nationa co. Stop letting countries come in and underbid what we can do better.
wedge said:
To resurrect fusion's question: I believe that he is correct about the corporate structure. GE Finance (legally called GE Capital Corp.) is a subsidiary of GE. As of 9/30/08, $535B of GE's $549B of debt is at GE Capital Corp. I don't see anywhere that says GE guarantees this debt. So I have the same question: Is GE on the hook for the debt at GE Capital?

If not, then if GE Capital goes bankrupt, GE is still left with businesses that did $10B of net income in 2007 and only $14B of debt.

No one said:
This is ridiculous. Seriously, this is short sellers, fund liquidations. Maybe a fox news plot if you're a conspiracy theorist.

GE's cash flow crunch will be backed by the US and foreign governments. They'll get paid back. Spank the "genius" financial group, dole out some penalties, and let's move on with our lives. Now we've learned where the scams are and we can avoid them.

One thing: if there are contract terms which require triple A rating, at this point, any lawyer could get GE out of that. The unexpected circumstances, combined with total lack of definition, puts the entire clause under suspicion. At a minimum, tie it up in litigation for a few years. Sheesh. Those will be a log in the road, not a bombshell. (Legal types: remember the Westinghouse uranium case from decades ago? Unexpected market conditions invalidated a contract clause?)

This whole thing is ridiculous, and people are running around like sheep. Don't you think the rest of world wants reliable electricity and clean water?
C'mon.
TL said:
Where is Welch when we need him? He has been unusually silent the past couple of weeks. I worked at GE Capital for 11 years and have a substantial retirement/investment in GE. If GE fails and the stock reaches ZERO, this country and most retirement programs are toast. We will truly be a communist/socialist country dependent on the government for our well being (pre-1988 Russia). Hell, even China is moving more to a capitalistic society and they do not even know it.... Tough 2 years ahead and then things will begin to improve. Pick the stocks of companies that will survive and buy, $ cost average. The short sellers are having a great time but at some point that will change. Those with the guts, will ultimately be winners. Market stops at 6,000 stays there for two years and begins a slow accent.....
rich b. said:
i don't want to get too snarky but if GE goes tits up every single person who posted a reply here will either be dead or digging roots up from the ground for food.

so what's the difference?


sell everything, buy GE.
dave said:
mr blodget

your articles do seem a cut above the rest
( might you be the fellow who got into trouble over tech wreck, by any chance ? just curious - your writings are appreciated anyhow )

but `fusion' is surely correct altho only GE or its lawyers (or filings) can say for sure - unless parent co guaranteed finance subs debts, rest of GE could walk away if Finance tanks
Cdub said:
Pretty sure gecc obligations cross collateralize with ge debt. That doesn't mean that you wouldn't try some tactics to isolate losses but those are usually only succcessful with debt counterparties when times are good (and the borrower is looking to lean on the corporate credit for a lower cost of funds). That said it would make for one ugly bk with more to unwind than Enwrong.

Raleigh retiree, pension benefits are typically backed by the PBGC arm of the us gov. What isn't often understood is that they don't take over payment obligations, just some portion. Do some web reading just so you understand the risk better. The PBGC has not been a great source for info in the past.

New GE Interest plus gets fdic wrap effective Nov 13, 2008 through 2012. If you're anxious you could always early withdraw the old deposits and redeposit with the wraps. Seems more research needed...
Tony said:
GM 335,000 employees
net income ($38,732,000)

GE 316,000 employees
net income 22,000,000

The Gov is going to bail GM out. Somehow I don't think GE is going anywhere.
Tony said:
Excuse me those numbers are in 1000's
Brian M said:
The management has not been forthcoming about their situation and that has caused the current crisis of confidence - the current CEO is a disaster
Ted Stryker said:
I am sure GE company is not in trouble. GE Capital contributes 50% of earnings (or less?), there is a great deal of media speculation about the state of GE when they really refer to GE Capital. Could a failure of Capital cause the collapse of GE as a whole? Unlikely. The media hype is driving down the stock value, right now if you are prepared to take a risk it could be a long term bargain.
Heritage 150cm said:
I agree with Rich B, everyone of us is knee deep in GE stock, I have 25 + years of S&SP hanging int his stock, I went balls to the wall yesterday and bought all I could get. If GE goes down this whole country is in deep shit, just don't be stupid and panic sell. this dip in the markeyt is just like Texas hold-em, go all in Baby !
Ted Stryker said:
Rich B is right... I am also all in. (gulp)
Jake said:
If the comments in this article are any indication, the only reason why GE hasn't sunk lower is a sentiment that it won't go belly up... not based on ACTUAL sound fundamentals.

See u at zero baby... or close to it.
Miklos said:
stock will be up again in a year or two... GE has some very solid industrial businesses and a financial arm which is much more conservative that most of the other financial services companies. i think this is the opportunity of a lifetime to invest...
Nathan said:
Firstly, all of your figures are wrong. GE Capital has roughly ~600 Billion in assets. To fund that it raises debt, at AAA ratings, some of that maybe secured and / or unsecured. But that doesn't matter because GE itself in turn takes the money it borrows and only lends it on a secured basis. e.g. they finance trucks / tractors, warehouses and things of that nature on a very conservative loan to value ratio, and with borrows in the A- to BB- credit strikezone. So essentially, if some doesn't repay GE, GE goes and collects the asset, e.g. a plane, forklift or truck, etc. and goes and re-leases it to the next customer. GE Capital has a huge asset management team - the best in the business. They have guys that just do forklifts for 20 odd years, and that's all they know. Or they just do aircraft and that's all they know. If you don't pay, then GE owns the asset and they can get it replaced. In the case of aircraft, if US Airways doesn't pay on their Aircraft lease, they simply take the aircraft and fly it to middle-east and give it to Emirtates Airline, or give it to Singapore airlines, etc. They have that airplane asset up and running again in a matter of days, with limited or no losses. Imagine a Wall Street Banker showing up a the customer and taking the airplane and flying it to the next customer! They don't and they can't because they don't consider this "the sexy business". But GE makes a ton of money doing it. They know what an aircraft will be worth in 3, 5, or 10 years, and they underwrite conservatively against this. GE is a secured lender. The banks are not. They lend unsecured to idiots who got a fancy MBA and learned how to write a business plan, and say that bio or tech is going to be big in the future so lend me money, on an unsecured / cash flow basis, and because tech industry will do well, i'll be able to repay you. GE Capital does not do this. They lend based off the asset you want. Any money they lend you is going to be secured based on hard assets, that they know, and understand and can take over and re-place if stuff hits the fan. GE probably turns away 90% or more of all the deals they see. They are very conservative. Additionally, the company match funds it's assets. So if you want a plane and GE finances that for 10 years, then they will the next day go out and issue a 10 year GE bond at a lower rate, and lock in the spread between what they borrow at and what they are lending at. Banks do the opposite, they lend lock and borrow short (e.g. through CP markets, overnight lending, etc). The shorter the term the lower the rate, but then they have roll-over risk, because they keep rolling over that money for the whole term of the 10 year deal. Also, they use higher leverage. GE's leveraged 6 to 1, and some of the banks are leverage 30 to 1. That means that for every deal that GE capital does the banks do 5 deals like it. Or put another way, if the bank experences default rates of 3% or so, which is very modest/reasonable in today's economy - then all of their equity is wiped out or worthless. Conversely, GE would have to experience default rates of 15+%, which again is highly unlikey given that the can sieze the assets they lend on (since their secured and have the best asset management team in the business - something the banks don't have), and place them very quickly with another borrow, or sell them and sometimes take a gain due to their conservative underwriting / residual values estimates. etc. This is what GE did with real estate. Back in the hay days when the markets were booming and the banks were doing all types of crazy real estate financing, GE was selling tons of real estate assets that it owned / leased to developers, and building up a huge war chest of capital. The requirement to be a chief risk officer in any of GE's real estate businesses is that you have had to at least been through 2 real estate cycles, which happens every 5-7 years. So GE knows the cycle and plays it well. There a risk shop more than anything, and not a conduit for lending other people's money like the banks e.g. the banks not only lend other peoples money, but also each others e.g. overnight lending, etc.

GE Capital still made 10 billion dollars in the worst year ever.
George said:
It's obvious that Nathan either did his homework or works for GE Capital. I know, because I have worked for GE Capital in portfolio management for years, and Nathan is spot on.

Remember, speculating in stocks is not for young boys in short pants. Don't propagate fear and continue to artificially depress the stock price.
brent said:
Wonderful insights. The comments GE is going to zero confirms it's time to buy. These must be the same people seven years ago who said brick and motar are dead buy webvan it's it's going to $100.

If history teaches us anything it's that some of you have learned nothing from history. Buy GE when fear is prevailing.
Scott (URL) said:
Nathan, I am a novice to stocks and I want to start a Roth IRA with GE. Dont take this the wrong way I dont mean it as a slam just a novice question. If GE stock is that strong and diversified why did it fall from $60 this year to $12 and change? Did their financial investments hurt them that bad?
Thanks..
Scott (URL) said:
Sorry I need to correct my post.I meant I dont understand why GE stock fell from $60 at one time not this year to $12 something yesterday..
Jake said:
Brett:

Au contriare. This is more like those folks who bought the dot com stocks AFTER they have dropped from 100's to $10 with the belief that it is "cheap".

GE is a behemoth who is leveraged to the hilt with GE Capital (just like the failing banks), and it is totally legit that the company may require bailing out... wiping out its shareholders in the process.

Jake said:
Sorry I meant Brent.
Nathan said:
Hi Scott, I am not a novice in stocks myself. I do have a significant amount of my own personal money in GE stock. I've been buying it over the last few years, and stepped up my efforts significantly in last few days with what ever spare cash I had. Again, I'm not an expert but will try to answer your question as to why did GE stock fall. It's useful to point out though that the company has grown revenues and profits double digits (e.g. 10+%) throughout the time period in which the stock has fallen from 50 or 60 down to now. There is an exception though that in 2001 the company did not grow double digits because they took one time charges for insurance business / and the sale of the re-insurance business. But still the underlying performance was good. Additionally, there is strong cash performance complimented by a large backlog of orders in every business from Aviation, locomotives to energy and oil and gas turbines, wind, solar, etc. Not to mention throughout the time period in which the stock fell, most if not all of the analysts had the stock at overweight or buy, etc. and had the price targeted at higher than what it trade. To try to understand the fall in the stock price over the last few years, I think no one can really fully explain but i think there are a few obvious factors. The first one is that there is probably some sort of Jack Welch / 90s bull market effect on the stock price. If you look at the long term trend of the Dow over the last 30 or 50 years... you can see a clear jump accross the board in the mid to late 90s. This was an unprecendented time of USA economic growth, and global expansion, and also a time of celebrity CEOs, and Jack Welch was probably the lead runner. So consequently, GE got a huge premium. So basically, I'm saying that the stock price was probably overvalued in late 90s / early 2000s, but I think in general the market was probably overvalued, which is what we're clearly seeing now. Stocks are returning to their long term trends of 8-10 % growth, etc. Another factor, is the people who are interested in GE stock, which is typically insurance and / or pension funds, large wealth management funds, even hedge funds. They are interested in primarily for the dividend yeild, and are not looking for any hugh price appreciation in the stock itself. The dividend yield on today's GE stock is somewhere in the range of 8%. Historically the company has kept the dividend yield at above inflation e.g. 3-4%. GE. People typically look at GE as a steady stock, that pays good dividends. If you want a growth stock, then you should have looked at Google, or Apple, or some of the bio companies. Those stocks you buy looking for price appreciation, and they also pay zero or no dividends. So today, if you buy GE stock, it's an almost guaranteed 5+% return on your money, because of the dividend yield. Now if people are buying this stock for those reasons, then typically if they go to sell the stock, then the price at which they sell maybe not be that big a factor to them either. People who hold GE stock are there for the long term typically, and so they've bought in 10 years ago, and so they've probably even at today's prices realized a modest return on their investment after stock splits, dividends, and price appreciation, etc. Also, you have to consider that this "institutions" that invest in GE stock, e.g. pensions / insurance / wealth management funds, and even hedge funds, are themselves in a cash crunch. They need to raise cash themselves to firstly pay out their own investors who are wanting their money back, or some of these insurance funds (AIG for example) engaged in some of these credit default swaps contracts (where you insure against corporate defualt) - you've probably heard about these, along with CDOs... all of these companies are having to raise cash from any source possible in order to meet their margin calls, and honour other committements, etc. So consequently there is a lot of selling pressure for those reasons, which are not anything fundamental to GE and their performance (which as we've noted has been solid). Additionally, to add to this, you have short sellers, who are somehow trying to bet against GE. They did this with Lehman, and Bear stearns too... they enter into short contracts, and then do as much as they can to spread negative press about the company, creating fear and panic, then they benefit when the price goes down. There has been numerous examples of hedge funds and short sellers that have done this, and the SEC hasn't gone after them and prosecuted them. This is also one reason why the government banned short selling. Also the press makes a lot of money every time you click an article with a negative headline, so all of this creates a spiral of negativity.

I think it's a losing proposition to bet against GE. Firstly the company, is a AAA rated company, which was re-affirmed by S&P in early October, in the middle of the huge credit hurricane. To get a AAA rating from any of the rating agencies is a long and exhaustive process. They come in and pour through your accoutning books and records, and do a lot of stress testing, etc. It's not just a tick in the box excercise. To have that re-affirmed in the midst of huge crisis and panic says something about the company.

Additionally, the government has taken measures that bolster the ability for GE to raise funds, in particular through the bond and CP markets, which is where it gets 80% of it's total funding. The government has agreed to guaranteed GE's commercial paper or buy it in should investors in that paper want to get out. They same is true for GE bonds. GE's commercial paper still trades at about Liber (90day) less 25 Bps and below the fed funds rate. So the company clearly has no troubles issuing CP at low rates, and has been doing it for ages, with out any trouble. But the fed stepping in doesn't really help GE so much as it helps the investors in GE's commercial paper and bonds, by providing them a way out, because remember a lot of the investors in GE are big institutions and pension funds, insurance co's etc, and they have their own liquidity issues, and some are in liquidity crisis, and having to sell assets so they can meet other funding requirements / cash requirements / reserves, etc. plus honor their dumb bets in credit default swaps and CDOs. It creates a more active secondary market for GE's debt investors.

As I said before, GE Capital does have a lot of debt, but all of that is matched by equivalent loans to solid borrows, and secured by assets that GE knows and understands, and has spent years developing the asset management expertise that the banks don't have. If you look at the banks they go in and out of the spaces that GE plays in. They entered the equipment leasing market back in the boom times, then got out in last few years (GE cherry picked some good portfolios). GE has a real competitive advantage because they tend to make long term committements to a space, and develop expertise. Like photo copiers for example. GE is the worlds largest leaser of Xerox and Ikon photocopiers. Do you think the banks want to even dabble in that business - no because it's not sexy. But how important is an office photocopier to any business - it's pretty crucial, but often overlooked. Also, it's extremely profitable, when the lease is up the customer typically keeps paying the standard lease payment. They don't typically rip out the photocopier / printer, etc. because it's all embedded infrastructure and they're use to it. etc. GE underwrites these assets in a very conservative way and all the debt that you see on GE's balance sheet is matchfunding against similar loans in duration to the customer. If the customer doesn't pay, then GE can seize those assets, and they have monster asset management team that can install that machine into another customer - globally, any where in the world. Where do you think GE puts all of the old IT computers and printers that US doesn't use any more. They sell them to dealers in East Europe, China and India. Same is true for manufacturing equipment and machines. GE knows the assets it lends against better than anyone, and they bring an industrial mind set to managing them over their useful life. Sometimes, they make more money selling these assets on the backend then they do actually leasing them, because of their global asset management capabilities.

The risk if you buy GE stock is if the company gets downgraded from a AAA. The company just got re-affirmed this rating as I said before, so that risk is now virtually eliminated. It doesn't have any short term funding risk, particularily because the governemtn has created a secondary market for existsing investors, which should hopefully help them to not worry, and maybe sell other assets to raise cash they need. Also, GE is determined to not lose the AAA. The company is 100% committed to it. In fact, back in the hay days, the company could have made more money and been more profitable, by letting the AAA go to a AA or single A because they could have had higher leverage and so done more deals and had higher Return on Equity, etc. but the company never did. There were a lot of calls from the analyst community suggesting this but the company never budged. Now of course they are genious for keeping the AAA, because there couldn't be a better time.

In short, I think now couldn't be a better time to buy GE stock, because the selling pressures are not fundamental to the company performance but a result of other things going on in the market. If you want a solid divident paying stock, that's a bellweather for the global economy GE is a good fit.

It's industrial business have no debt, and generate a ton of cash. They have order backlogs out 5+ years. Why because GE plays in the spaces that the world needs. GE's aircraft engines are 85% more efficient then their competitor. Same is true for their locomotives and energy turbines. Thier locomotives plant in Erie, PA is at maximum capacity. They can't make the machines fast enough. A buddy of mine used to work in the plant bending steal and he got paid time and a half because he was always working weekends. Why is locomotives, because China and India are ordering those things like hot cakes, not to mention the big 6 rail companies in North America need more capacity. GE couples these engines with services, which are much more profitable. The rail business in US is regulated so the machines can only run on certain rails at certain times (e.g. not through a neighborhood at 2am, etc) and the rail tracks are limited because government never invested in them and built them out, and the 6 rail companies in N. America have to share the tracks GE develops the software that optimally plans the most efficient route, etc. And bundles this on an engine sell. Not to mention all the spare parts and quarterly maintenance that these things need... huge profit margins there. Did you know that when China makes all their goods and sends it to western europe they do not go through Asia / Middle East / East Europe to get it to say Germany or UK for example. It's much easier for them to cross the pacific ocean, then truck it or rail it accross the USA, and then ship it accross the atlantic. There's less international barriers and import / export rules to deal with, plus the US highway / rail system is more efficient relatively then all those little crappy countries they'd have to pass through. So globalization of goods and services is driving huge demand. Truck drives is a job that's hugely understaffed right now. You can make upwards of 75K a year as a truck driver these days. Rail is at capacity too, and with higher oil prices, and need for more efficient engines then the last GE is sold out. Thier latest locomotive runs on hydrogen or is electric or something like that, but in either case it's much more efficient than the last and beats the competition. There are few competitors too. Rolls Royce is a big player, but that's about it I think.

In case you're wondering I have a huge amount of my own personal money (albeit not a lot to others but is to me), and so obviously I have a huge incentive to spread good press about the company, but in this day and age, if the US economy blows up the last company standing will be GE. 60+% of the companies revenues are outside US.
Nathan said:
PS. To Jack's comment that GE is just like the banks, it's obvious they are nothing like the banks. The first big difference is the banks lend virtually all "unsecured". GE is not like the banks - they are only a "secured" lender. So if you want GE Capital's money you have to give them an asset as collateral, not like the banks who places bets on the industry, or the management team, or the historical cash flow. GE doesn't look at any of that - they look at ASSETS and lend against it. Additionally, they are AAA rated - one of only 8 AAA rated companies in the world (probably less than 8 now). GE Capital is technically known as a "finance company" not a brokerage or bank holding company. The AAA rating brings a whole different mindset as to how the raise capital, and lend that capital. Additionally, they have an industrial business/mindset that compliments their lending business and allows them to understand the assets they lend against. They rotate their employees in / out of industrial and capital to drive the mindset into each business. Mike Neal the CEO of GE Capital started in GE Energy, so the did the CFO Jeff Borstein - also started in GE's energy business. The long time / former head of NBC - Bob Wright used to be at GE Capital.

Before you idiots hypothesize that GE will fail because it's "like the banks, you should know the real difference" and do a bit of homework. Lets not keep spreading fear and panic. The Dow can only go to zero you know. Do you think that's going to happen, really?

Don't be an idiot, buy stocks. it's a great time, not just for GE stock.

Since they don't borrow like the banks, they don't have a short term lending risks like the banks did. They also don't egage any anything to complex / sophisticated like Credit default swaps / Collateralized debt obligations. "GE is smart, but not brilliant" like that, is one quote from a senior guy that I read about. That's how all the banks got themselves in a cluster f*ck of obligations to each other, with no real certainty of what the underlying assets are worth (because they're all unsecured lenders, remember!)

Even the GE money business, that the company is trying to sell ha been profitable this year. The company wants to sell it because it doesn't like the space, and it's levered too much. Requires to much capital, and they'd rather deploy capital in higher returning businesses too. The returns on equity in GE money are somewhere in the low teens, good by any normal investors standars, but GE looks for ROE% north of 20% in capital business (now they will get even higher returns with cost of debt going up accross the board but probably incremantally more for GE's customers than the GE itself). They exited the insurance business for much the same reasons e.g. low returns.

Additionally, the company in general wants to downsize the capital business so that it's inline with about 40% of the total company. Capital firms get a lower PE than industrial businesses, so have a smaller capital business should help the stock appreciate better.

Also, take a look at GE's net income and you will see that the company made more in 2008 then it ever made before! And it's GE Capital business, with 10 Bn in net income, was more profitable than any of the other financial firms - combined!
Scott (URL) said:
Nathan, Thank you for taking the time to explain these things to me. I appreciate it very much. It is very interesting to me to listen to an obviously very well informed and educated opinion. I am going to start my Roth IRA with GE and I feel alot more comfortable with that decision after getting your input.
Thanks Again..
Brent said:
Jake

It's clear that anything is possible given the current sentiment and fear driving the market. Let's be resonable though. These type of declines happen. It doesn't mean Doom and Gloom forever. Certainly recent events are unpresidented atleast for my generation. Have faith my freinds. I was behind a lady in line recently buying a GE slow cooker. My wife was in the hospital last month and the ultra sound device was made by GE. I toured the Boeing plant outside Seattle with my family and watched workers install GE engines. Everytime I walk into my kitchen I see the GE logo etc... My point is we will continue to cook our food, visit the hospital when needed, Fly on planes that are constantly serviced and life will go on.

If I didn't know better Mr. Jake and those with the same opinion, I would say somebody is shorting GE and trying to drive the price lower. If that's the case my friend don't get caught short this week. You've been warned.

Regards.
fdhg (URL) said:
Mac DVD Ripper is an all-in-one DVD ripper for Mac OS X software. This Mac DVD Ripper is an excellent DVD Decryption tool for Mac users to rip DVD to various video formats (including MP4, AVI, M4V, MOV, 3GP, MPG, FLV) and audio formats (MP3, M4A, AAC, WAV, OGG, APE, etc.) for playback on iPod touch, iPod classic, iPod nano, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, PS3, Youtube (web), Creative Zen, iRiver PMP, Archos, all kinds of video cell phones and digital video and audio players. The Mac DVD Ripper is what godgious you need to put your DVD movies on your mobile devices.This Mac DVD Ripper software lets you select DVD subtitle and audio track, choose any DVD chapters/titles you want to convert, trim any DVD chapters/titles, and even merge more than one DVD chapter/title into a single file. Put your DVD movies on almost any mobile devices with this professional Mac DVD Ripper Software! please take a carefully look at the following link:Mac DVD Ripper.and another a greate converter software is vob converter for mac.VOB Converter for Mac is an excellent VOB to Video conversion software for Mac OS users to convert VOB files on Mac to various video formats perfectly and quickly. The Mac VOB converter supports converting VOB to mp4, avi, mov, mpeg-4 etc and also converting to PSP, Apple TV , iPod, iPhone, Archos, video mobile phone, Zune, etc. Aha,please come in the following link:VOB Converter for Mac
Debbie said:
Nathan,

Have very much enjoyed your info and opinions. My father just passed away, and left 43,000 shares of GE in a trust that I must manage. I can sell, diversify, cash it all in, or stay in fhe game. I am 46 years old, and have been "trained" by my Dad for the last 34 years. He gave me my first subscription to Forbes and Money when I was 10, and made me pick a Mutual every year after my 18th birthday, and funded them for me as IRA's.......and as a lesson to add to my mini-portfolio of learning how to plan for the future. Here I sit, comfortable in my faith in GE.......but wonder, would you diversify more?? This is a nestegg that I plan to send my kids to college on.
Scott said:
Nathan, If I could get your opinion again. I was reading your post again and I noticed what you mentioned about a growth stock. I am almost 50 and am on probably about a 15 yr time frame before retiring, Would it be in my better interest to get into some kind of a growth stock instead of GE? For example I noticed you had mentioned Apple. That is trading around $90 a share with a roth IRA limiting you to $5000 a year I could not buy many shares of this as supposed to GE at $14 a share which I could get more shares for my money. I guess my question to you is GE sounds like it is a pretty steady and solid stock but should I be more aggresive in your opinion with a 12 to 15 year time frame as opposed to 30 years?
Thanks;
Scott
Nathan said:
Hello,

Thanks for your compliments. I am happy to offer my opinions.

It seems to me GE is at or near a bottom, as well as the market in general. I think this because of all the serious finance actions that the government has taken. In business and economics there is one general rule, and that is that the government always wins. They will keep throwing cash at this problem until it goes away, and do any tricks that they can. We are seeing the effects of actions that took in the last couple quarters now, and liquidity has eased now in the system. But still there is a consensus that there will be a recession for next 6 months it seems. People haven't been spending and so everything has slowed. But this will be balanced by massive government spending and stimulus to the economy. Risks are if the US government gets downgraded as a AAA entity. There was an article in the WSJ talking about this a few weeks back. If this happens, then by default no US company can be a AAA rated company. But hopefully that doesn't happen, and I think it won't. Also, hopefully the US government doesn't get to protectionist, because international trade and low trade barriers is also a net good thing for the economy, at least that's what all the economic experts say. Scott and Debbie at ages 46 and almost 50 you should be looking to diversify more. This is the general investing rules, as you probably know. Keeping all your money in one stock is in general pretty risky. I keep all my money in GE stock because I'm young - 29. But I will try to diversify as time goes on. Warren Buffet keeps all his personal money in US Treasuries, and he holds personal money in only one stock - Wells Fargo (used to be AAA rated bank - one of only 8 companies, they got downgraded to AA though I think after they swallowed up Wachovia). But that said Warren has stock holdings through his company Berkshier Hathway and that includes Goldman and GE, and others I don't know about.

I think if you are trying to keep your money in GE for 5 + years then you are safe. Given that I think it's at or near a bottom now, you should get a decent return. I would consider short term < 1 year. Medium term 2-4 years, and long term 5+ years. Beyond 5 years it's kind of hard to predict much really.

I probably wouldn't consider Apple a growth stock now versus as much as they used to be a growth stock. Of course that's all with high insight now after observing their explosive growth. So basically you should try to look for other better opportunities then Apple. I don't know what they are myself - no body knows. But you should pick up some books from Jim Cramer. He has good stock advice and a proven track record of performance too. You should look in the bio-technology space. They are doing some funky stuff now a days with predictive health and mapping out the human DNA / genes and stuff like that, then they develop medicines based off your characteristics and can predict what illness you are prone too, etc. It helps insurance companies lower their cost by treating you earlier, but there can be a moral hazzard too if they use it to deny you insrance, but government won't allow that obviously. With all the baby boomers retiring over next 10-15 years there will be massive innovation in healthcare and medicines though (there already has been). Plus baby boomers are pretty wealthy too (or maybe not so much now with stocks down - but hopefully the diversified out of stocks) Not to mention healthcare demands in China and India too. Look for companies that are on the leading edge in technology here. I used to know a few but don't know their names now.

Also, it looks like green energy will be a huge deal now. Green venture capital is the new gold rush out here in silicon valley california is what they say. And remember government always gets their way, so they will throw cash and give incentives to people who develop the technology. You could go to venture capital companies websites and see what companies they are sponsoring and then try to understand these and pick a few theres.

Financial companies will be hurt it seems in medium term because they will have to operate with less leverage, so the returns won't be as big.

Also, I think video games and hand held devices will continue to be a mega trend (e.g. Apple). There's companies developing better and better games for smaller and smaller devices. To go along with all these devices you need content (e.g. Universal, and other big media companies). So they will be key players in this space.

You can also try to diversify geographically if you dare.

But in general, at your respective ages, I would be trying to keep all your money in stocks. You should have a mix of other stuff like high yield CDs and US treasuries. But your still a good 15 years away from retiring, and if you're money is in stocks I'd probably keep it there and take a little bit off the table as you see it go up. So if you got money in GE stock, then you should maybe take out 10% or 15% if you see the stock go up by 5% or more, and slowly over next few years take money out. I still think you can have a large part of your portfolio in stocks though (e.g. 65% say), but to preserve your wealth you should start to be more risk averse. You should have a more diverse stock holding too. But it seems your goals are to grow your money so you should definately try to pick a few good stocks. You don't need an investment advisor either they just charge you moeny, and this stuff is not rocket science - you can go online and read their analyst reports and things or read companies annual reports too..
Nathan said:
another big trend is "miniaturization" esp. in healthcare equipment. You ever walk through a hospital and they have massive machines everywhere. Well now a days they are shrinking that equipment and making it better / faster and more mobile so doctors can come to you. Just like how computers shrank over last few years, they will apply all that to hospital equipment now.

Also, high oil impacts a lot of business positively. Anybody who makes things that are more efficient, well their value add increases with the price of oil. So with oil down now, could be a good opportunity to buy some of those companies stocks. GE should benefit hugely from higher oil prices - since all their machines are more efficient than the last, etc.
DVD Converter Mac is a powerful DVD converter for Mac OS users to rip DVD to all popular video and audio formats with various customized settings and convert video among all popular video and audio formats with perfect 1:1 ratio on Mac. In fact, the DVD Converter Mac is a DVD Converter for Mac Ultimate which includes 4 outstanding multimedia applications: DVD Ripping Mac, DVD Creater for Mac, Copy DVD on Mac and Mac Video Converter.With the DVD Converter Mac, you can convert MP4, M4V, MPA, MPG, MPEG, MOV, 3GP, 3GP2, FLV, VOB, DAT, TS, TP, TRP, M2TS, AVI to DVD and even burn DVD movie on Mac.That's sure powerfully, hurry to see it!DVD Converter for Mac.Now let's see another converter software is Mac AVI Converters.Mac AVI Converters is a powerful and versatile Video/Audio Conversion utility for Mac OS X users to convert video files from one format to another and extract or save the audio tracks on Mac OS X (including OS X 10.5 Leopard). The Mac AVI Converters helps you convert AVI to video formats like, DivX, MPEG, MPG, FLV, DAT, MOV, ASF, FLV, etc. It can also extract audio from video to MP3, WMA, AC3, AAC, M4A, WAV, OGG, 3GP, etc.The Mac AVI Converters can also convert MPEG1, MPEG2, MP4, 3GP, 3G2, MOV, Mpeg TS/TP (for HD Video) formats, too.With such powerful and versatile AVI converter for Mac, you can easily playback AVI video files on any popular video players, like iPod, PSP, Apple TV, Archos, iRiver, Creative Zen, PS3 or other portable MP4 players. Try Mac AVI Converter for free.That's a turely chance,hurry to see it!AVI Converter for Mac.
Scott said:
Nathan, Thank you again for your input, it is very interesting. I have a 401K at work that is with fidelity. I have a pretty good mix of large cap, mid, small and international as well as pimco, so i am pretty well diversified there. Do you still think it is a good idea to diversify in my roth also? Like I said before I am a novice in stocks and i guess what I was after when I opened my roth was just to get a good solid stock that i could sock some money away in and have that going for me to along with my 401K. I guess that's why GE caught my eye it seems like you're getting a blue chip stock with a good possibility to grow in the coming years for a very good price.
Nathan said:
Hi Scott,

GE just confirmed that they will maintain their 2009 dividend at $1.24 per share. So at today's share price of 15 odd dollars you are looking at a dividend yield of like 8% or 9%. So basically you get a guaranteed return of that amount. All the analyst got GE pegged currently at about 24 or 25 bucks a share... I think you can't go wrong putting your money in GE if you are going to hold it for 3 to 5 years or more. But again this is just my humble opinion... I'm not a stock expert.

Also, GE's revenues are 60% international, and they are playing bigger in countries like China, India, and middle east... all those companies will be spending enormous amounts on infrastructure in order to stimulate their economies (e.g. building energy plants / hospitals / transportation, etc. ... that's all right up GE's alley, and few competitors too, and GE's been working on a "company to country" approach with all these customers. I think GE stock has a lot of upside at today's prices... I think it has a better chance of going up then down at this point.

China recently announced a $586Bn economic stimulus package to stimulate their economy... that's how most of these countries will bolster their economy during a predicted downturn / recession e.g. spend / spend / spend... governments always get their way, and GE is a huge beneficiary of government spending.

GE management will do some things to re-structure the company too, so the company will come through this turmoil better / stronger for the future (e.g. more profitable).
Scott said:
Thanks Nathan, In your opinion will GE get back up to around $60 a share eventually?
Scott said:
Nathan hat do you think of the possible downgrade to GE?

Join the discussion